From: [identity profile] jsks.livejournal.com


last time i checked the review out of 7 comments 6 agreed with the reviewer and only one wanted a more positive review.

From: [identity profile] dr-doomsduck.livejournal.com


Which is quite childish isn't it, whining at every bad review because "Gwen is awesome and you must WUV torchwood. Screw those reviewers, they're not real fans!" Good god, you'd almost think we were in the Torchwood fandom!

From: [identity profile] milady-dragon.livejournal.com


Yet another voice of reason amid the squee'ing of the Pom Poms...thank God.

From: [identity profile] stlscape.livejournal.com


New York Times isn't impressed either:

http://tv.nytimes.com/2011/07/08/arts/television/torchwood-returns-for-season-4-on-starz-review.html

From: [identity profile] jennelldhalrbj.livejournal.com


I know this sounds awful but I love these negative reviews. Thanks for finding them and providing links.

From: [identity profile] xandra-ptv.livejournal.com


So I just watched the pre-release on on-demand (because I apparently like punishing myself) And I had seen the promo's where Gwen was holding the baby like a shield and figured... oh that just out of context... well in context is worse. And that wasn't even the worst of it.

I think I could have handled this season (stupid plot though it might be) if they had left Gwen out of it.
.

Profile

antigwenallies: (Default)
The Anti Gwen Alliance

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags